Blog

Visit completion rates

Nine male patients were enrolled during January 2019 to September 2019. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, study participation was incomplete. Pre-COVID pandemic onset (March 2020), 80.1% of the expected 171 visits were attended (including baseline visits). Post-COVID pandemic, 19.7% of the 458 scheduled visits were attended. The cognitive assessments DAS-II and VABS-3 were performed at baseline only. All other assessments had follow-up visits completed at varying time points (Supplementary Table 1).

Study population and genetic analysis results

We included eight pediatric males and one adult male from the USA, comprising eight families. The characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. Nonsense mutations occurred in six patients (66%) and three patients (33%) had deletions (Table 2).

Patient reported outcome measures

PCQLI

Patient responses

Seven of eight pediatric patients had baseline PCQLI responses (88%, n = 7), of which seven had follow-up responses (100%, n = 7). The baseline mean for the Disease Impact subscale was 25.6 ± 6.0. The mean follow-up time was 26.6 months for both patient and parent responses (see all responses in Supplementary Table 2). At last follow up, four patients (57%, n = 4) reported lower Disease Impact scores. For the Psychosocial Impact Score, the mean at baseline was 28.9 ± 7.5. At last follow-up, three patients (43%, n = 3) reported lower scores. For the Total Score, the mean was 54.5 ± 10.5 at baseline. At last follow-up, four patients (57%, n = 4) reported lower total scores.

Parent responses

For the parents, there were eight baseline responses (100%, n = 8), of which seven had follow-up responses (88%, n = 7). Mean follow-up time was 26.6 months. The baseline mean for Disease Impact was 23.8 ± 6.9, with three parents (43%, n = 3) reporting lower scores for their children at last follow up. Mean Psychosocial Impact score at baseline was 28.9 ± 9.6, with five parents (71%, n = 5) reporting lower scores at last follow-up. Finally, the mean Total Score was 52.8 ± 14.9 at baseline, and four parents (57%, n = 4) reported lower total scores for their children at last follow up. The mean scores can be visualized for children and parents in Fig. 1. Notably, average difference between patient and parent Total Scores were 9.1 ± 7.9 and concordance in longitudinal improvements or worsening of scores over time between patients and parents was 75% (n = 9).

PQLQ

The average scores for the subscales of the PQLQ can be found in Table 3 (see all responses in Supplementary Table 3). Both patients and their parents responded to this. The max score for all subscales was 100. The mean follow-up time was 28.3 months. Figure 2 shows the scores for physical, emotional, social, and school functioning.

Patient responses

Six of eight pediatric patients had baseline responses (75%, n = 6), of which five patients had follow-up responses (83%, n = 5). For the physical health summary score, which is equal to the physical functioning score, the baseline mean was 50.0 ± 6.3; two patients (40%, n = 2) reported lower physical health summary scores at follow-up. For the psychosocial health summary score, the baseline mean was 55.3 ± 24.7; one patient (17%, n = 1) reported a lower psychosocial health summary score for themselves at follow-up. For emotional functioning, baseline mean was 66.7 ± 24.8, and two patients (40%, n = 2) reported worse functioning at follow-up (Fig. 2). For social functioning, baseline mean was 54.2 ± 32.9, and four patients (60%, n = 3) reported worse functioning at follow-up. For school functioning, baseline mean was 45.8 ± 30.1, and four patients (60%, n = 3) reported worse functioning at follow-up. Finally, for the total score, baseline mean was 53.4 ± 17.6, and one patient (20%, n = 1) reported a lower total score at follow-up.

Parent responses

Seven parents had baseline responses (88%, n = 7), of which six had follow-up responses (86%, n = 6) (Table 3). For the physical health summary score, the mean at baseline was 47.1 ± 8.4. At follow-up, all parents (100%, n = 7) reported worse functioning in their child. For the psychosocial health summary score, the baseline mean was 43.7 ± 16.0 and only one parent (17%, n = 1) reported a lower follow-up psychosocial health summary score. For emotional functioning, baseline mean was 52.9 ± 30.4, and four parents (67%, n = 4) reported worse functioning at follow-up. For social functioning, baseline mean was 44.6 ± 13.7, and four parents (67%, n = 4) reported worse functioning at follow-up. For school functioning, baseline mean was 33.6 ± 9.4, and three patients (50%, n = 3) reported worse functioning at follow-up. Finally, for the total score, baseline mean was 44.9 ± 8.6, and four parents (67%, n = 4) reported lower total scores at follow-up. Average difference between patient and parent total scores was 13.4 ± 9.1. Additionally, concordance in longitudinal changes in patient and parent total scores was 58% (n = 5). Parents were more likely to describe physical decline at follow up compared to the patients themselves. Although the remaining emotional, social and school functioning dimensions were more concordant between parents and patients, the total PQLQ parent scores were still lower at follow up compared to patients.

Cognitive and neuropsychological assessment

In our cohort, all patients (100%, n = 9) were affected by neuropsychological symptoms that included: learning difficulties (100%, n = 9), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (56%, n = 5), anxiety (44%, n = 4), depression (44%, n = 4), autism (22%, n = 2) and global developmental delay (11%, n = 1).

DAS-II

Six patients in the cohort completed the DAS-II at baseline. Figure 3a shows the average score for our cohort in each of the domains (see the scores for each domain for each patient in Supplementary Table 4). The mean at baseline for each domain in our cohort was: GCA, 67.0 ± 14.7; verbal, 66.3 ± 19.0; nonverbal, 70.5 ± 18.3; spatial, 68.7 ± 18.3.

VABS-3

All patients completed the VABS-3 at baseline. The mean at baseline for each domain in our cohort was: ABC, 68.9 ± 11.4; communication, 66.2 ± 18.5; daily living skills 74.0 ± 11.7; socialization, 69.4 ± 10.9 (Fig. 3b; see the scores for each domain for each patient in Supplementary Table 5).

Ophthalmological assessment

DD patients very commonly have visual disturbances. In our cohort, eight patients had one or more ophthalmological changes (89%, n = 8): nyctalopia (11%, n = 1), photophobia (11%, n = 1), blurry vision (33%, n = 3), myopia (78%, n = 7), prescribed corrective lenses (78%, n = 7), and photophobia (89%, n = 8). The BCVA was within the normal range for all patients (100%, n = 9). Of note, hyperreflective foci were identified at the level of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) and the border of the outer plexiform layer in six patients (67%, n = 6) in SD-OCT (example in Fig. 4). These patients also had paler fundus pseudocolor images with what appeared to be a loss of retinal pigmentation. Fundus autofluorescence imaging demonstrated increased macular autofluorescence.

Cardiopulmonary assessment

Most patients in the cohort reported cardiac related symptoms (78%, n = 7): dyspnea (33%, n = 3), palpitations (44%, n = 4), and chest pain (56%, n = 5). All nine patients had baseline echocardiograms (100%, n = 9) and seven patients had follow-up echocardiograms (78%, n = 7). Regarding outcomes, one patient underwent transplantation during the study period at age 14. There were no deaths or ventricular assist device implantations. Two pediatric patients had baseline data only; one patient underwent cardiac transplantation and another patient stopped following up due to the COVID pandemic. Due to standardized z-score reporting in pediatric patients, we separated the pediatric patients (n = 8) from the adult patient (n = 1). The mean follow-up time was 24.5 months for the pediatric patients. Mean EF at baseline was 68.9 ± 4.8%. After the mean follow-up time, all six pediatric patients with follow-ups had lower EF values (100%, n = 6). The mean EF at last follow-up was 64.3 ± 8.5%, with an average paired difference of -5.9% which based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, was not statistically significant. The adult patient had a baseline EF of 47% and at last follow-up 41%.

For wall thickness, we utilized a maximum wall thickness (MWT) that measured the largest of the septal or posterior wall. The average MWT at baseline for the pediatric patients was 13.6 ± 7.1 mm (z-score = 6.9 ± 6.2; 75% [n = 6] of pediatric patients had a z-score > 2 at baseline). At last follow-up, wall thickness increased in all six pediatric patients (100%, n = 6). The mean MWT at last follow-up was 15.6 ± 6.8 mm (z-score = 9.4 ± 7.6), with an average paired difference of 3.8 mm, which based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, was not statistically signfiicant. For the young adult, his MWT was 30.4 mm at baseline and 28.2 mm at last follow-up after six months.

Mean LVEDD at baseline for the pediatric patients was 37.8 ± 5.7 mm (z-score = -1.6 ± 1.8). At last follow-up, four patients had a smaller LVEDD (67%, n = 4). Both patients with increased LVEDD, dilated in isolation of ventricular wall thinning, but did experience a drop in LVEF. The mean at last follow-up for the pediatric patients was 36.5 ± 6.7 mm (z-score = -2.1 ± 1.5), with an average paired difference of -0.5 mm. For the young adult, who had LV wall thinning and a drop in his LVEF during follow up, his LVEDD was 43.1 mm at baseline and 46.2 mm at last follow-up after six months.

Mean LV mass at baseline for the pediatric patients was 192.7 ± 133.1 g (z-score = 7.5 ± 6.6). Of the pediatric patients in the cohort (n = 8), 75% (n = 6) had a z-score >2 at baseline. At follow-up (n = 6), six patients had increased LV mass (100%, n = 6). Mean LV mass at last follow-up was 200.7 ± 88.9 g (z-score = 10.9 ± 12.0), with an average paired difference of + 66.2 g, which based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, was not statistically significant. For the young adult, he had an LV mass of 835.1 g at baseline and 789.1 g at follow-up after six months. Mean GLS at baseline for the pediatric patients was − 14.1% ± 2.9% which is lower than the − 20% measured in children without any cardiomyopathy [20]. Four pediatric patients (50%, n = 4) had follow-up GLS values, of which two had a GLS that was less negative (50%, n = 2). Mean GLS at last follow-up was − 14.7% ± 5.1%, with an average paired difference of + 0.14%. For the adult patient, the GLS at baseline was − 5.8% and at last follow-up was − 3.0%. Of note, this patient’s LVEF was already less than 50% base baseline. All echocardiogram data can be seen in Table 4; Fig. 5, and Supplementary Fig. 1.

Electrocardiogram findings

DD causes dysfunctional macroautophagy that results in accumulation of intracellular vacuoles, a mismatch between supply and demand of energy within cells and eventual cell death. The cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis that occur result in significant electrophysiologic abnormalities including high voltage with repolarization abnormalities, conduction disorders, accessory pathways, and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings at baseline were also assessed in all nine patients. Baseline ECG findings included: Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) (56%, n = 5), LV hypertrophy (44%, n = 4), biventricular hypertrophy (22%, n = 1), sinus bradycardia (11%, n = 1), and 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block (11%, n = 1).

Pulmonary function testing

Most of our patients (89%, n = 8) had respiratory related problems: wheezing (44%, n = 4), dyspnea (33%, n = 3), cough (22%, n = 2), asthma allergies (11%, n = 1), and sleep apnea (11%, n = 1). In our cohort, seven patients underwent PFTs at baseline (78%, n = 7) and five patients completed a follow-up visit (71%, n = 5). At baseline, the average percent of predicted seated upright FVC was 74.6% ± 8.5% (2.3 ± 1.3 L) (Table 5). After a mean follow-up time of 5.8 months, one patient had a lower upright FVC (20%, n = 1), one had no change (20%, n = 1), and three had an increase (60%, n = 3). The mean percent of predicted upright FVC at last follow-up was 74.0% ± 9.6% (2.4 ± 1.6 L).

Mean percent of predicted supine FVC at baseline was 60.7% ± 12.6% (1.8 ± 1.2 L). After the mean follow-up time, from the five patients who completed a follow-up visit, one patient had a lower FVC (20%, n = 1), one had no change (20%, n = 1), and the rest had an increase (60%, n = 3). Last follow-up percent of predicted supine FVC was 64.4% ± 14.0% (2.0 ± 1.3 L).

The mean percent of predicted FEV1 was 53.6% ± 16.6% (1.6 ± 1.0 L). At follow-up, two patients had a lower percent of predicted FEV1 (40%, n = 2). The mean percent of predicted FEV1 at follow-up was 61.6% ± 16.8% (1.8 ± 1.3 L).

For the FEV1/FVC ratio, the mean percent of predicted was 103.4% ± 1.6% (0.89 ± 0.09). At follow-up, one patient had a lower percent of predicted FEV1/FVC (20%, n = 1), one had no change (20%, n = 1), and three had an increased (60%, n = 3). The mean at follow-up was 108.2% ± 7.7% (0.92 ± 0.05 L).

CPET

In this study, CPET was performed at baseline and at one follow-up visit, with a mean follow-up time of 5.2 months. Five patients performed CPET in our cohort (56%, n = 5) at baseline and at one follow-up, for a total of 10 visits. Our cohort had a baseline mean VO₂ max of 17.2 ± 4.4 ml/kg/min (percent of predicted of 39.0 ± 9.0%) (Table 6; Fig. 6a, Supplementary Table 6). After a mean follow-up time of 5.2 months, three patients had a lower VO₂ max (60%, n = 3). At last follow-up, the mean VO₂ max was 17.6 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min (percent of predicted of 42.6 ± 13.0%). Out of the 10 total visits, six assessments reached an RQ of ≥ 1.0 (60%, n = 6). The baseline mean for ventilatory efficiency (V_E/VCO₂ slope) was 28.4 ± 2.5 (Table 6; Fig. 6b, Supplementary Table 6). After the mean follow-up time, two patients had a smaller V_E/VCO₂ slope (40%, n = 2). At last follow-up, the mean V_E/VCO₂ slope was 29.5 ± 3.2.

Neuromuscular assessment

Seven patients (78%) in our cohort reported neuromuscular symptoms at baseline: delay in motor milestones (67%, n = 6), difficulty running (67%, n = 6), difficulty walking (67%, n = 6), fatigue (67%, n = 6), weakness (67%, n = 6), joint pain (33%, n = 3), difficulty sitting (11%, n = 1), hypotonia (11%, n = 1), loss of range of motion (11%, n = 1), and abnormal gait (11%, n = 1). All limbs were found to be affected across the cohort: lower proximal limb (78%, n = 7), lower distal limb (67%, n = 6), upper proximal limb (56%, n = 5), upper distal limb (44%, n = 4).

For the 6MWT, all patients had baseline testing (100%, n = 9), but only seven patients had follow-up testing (78%, n = 7). At baseline, our cohort averaged 448.7 ± 64.7 m (Table 6; Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 7). After a mean follow-up time of 23.3 months, four patients walked shorter distances (57%, n = 4). The mean distance at last follow-up was 405.9 ± 136.1 m, with an average paired difference of -25.9 m.

The results for the NSAA, 10MWT, time to rise from floor, and 4SC tests are shown in Fig. 8. For the NSAA, all patients completed the test at baseline (100%, n = 9). Seven patients completed follow-up visits (78%, n = 7), with a mean follow-up time of 23.1 months. The average NSAA total score at baseline was 28 ± 9 out of a max total of 34. After the follow-up time, one patient had a worse NSAA total score (14%, n = 1) and two patients had better scores (29%, n = 2) (Supplementary Table 8, Supplementary Fig. 4a). Out of the seven patients who had follow-up data, four (57%, n = 4) had no changes over 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-ups. One of our patients, Patient 3, had markedly worse NSAA total score and 10MWT and 4SC times. Notably this patient had difficulty following instructions, which may have impacted these scores (Supplementary Fig. 4).

For the 10MWT, all nine patients (100%, n = 9) completed the test at baseline, but only seven (78%, n = 7) patients had follow-up testing done. The mean follow-up time was 19.4 months. In our cohort, ages 6–20, the baseline average speed was at 2.4 ± 0.6 m/s. At the end of study, two patients were slower (29%, n = 2). The average speed at follow-up was 2.2 ± 1.0 m/s.

For the time to rise from floor test, nine patients completed the test at baseline (100%, n = 9) and seven patients completed follow-up testing (78%, n = 7). The mean follow-up time was 23.3 months. The average time taken at baseline was 5.9 ± 4.1 s. At the end of the study, three patients took longer to rise from the floor (43%, n = 3). The mean time at last follow-up was 8.9 ± 11.8 s.

For the 4SC, we had nine patients complete the test at baseline (100%, n = 9), and seven patients with follow-up visits (78%, n = 7). The average speed at baseline was 1.1 ± 0.4 stairs/sec. After the mean follow-up time of 19.4 months, two patients were slower (29%, n = 2) (Fig. 8d).

Laboratory parameters

All patients completed the baseline laboratory measurements and follow-up with a mean follow-up time of 18.6 months. Of note, cardiac biomarkers including N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) were elevated at both baseline and follow-up. Similarly, skeletal biomarkers including CPK and aldolase were similarly elevated at baseline and follow-up, as were AST, ALT and LDH (Table 7). Figure 9 shows the values for NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT for all patients at baseline and follow-up only, where mean paired difference was 971.3 pg/mL and 37.3 respectively, which based on Wilcoxon signed-rank test was a significant increase in NT-proBNP, but not hs-cTnT; Supplementary Fig. 5 shows the values at all visits.